Amphiphilic Block Copolymers as Stabilizers in Emulsion Polymerization: Effects of the Anchoring Block Molecular Weight Dispersity on Stabilization Performance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Poly(sodium acrylate)- b -polystyrene block copolymers were employed as stabilizers in the emulsion polymerization of styrene. Previous work by our group has shown that the molecular weight dispersity of the stabilizing block is an important design parameter of block copolymer stabilizers; herein, the molecular weight dispersity of the anchoring polystyrene block, Đ PS, was investigated. Stabilization performance was evaluated by the critical aggregation concentration, aggregation number, and surface activity of the block copolymers and the size, distribution, and zeta potential of the polystyrene latex particles. It was observed that Đ PS had a strong effect on aggregation number, which led to a change in the number of latex particles in the seeded emulsion polymerization of styrene. Surface activity decreased with increasing Đ PS due to a greater diversity of copolymer compositions, supporting the idea that copolymers of different composition play different roles in the stabilization of an emulsion. The performance of block copolymer stabilizers, evaluated by the stability and size distribution of latex particles, was indistinguishable over the range of Đ PS studied; narrow stabilizer molecular weight distributions were not necessary for satisfactory performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".