Werewolves, Magnetic Fields and Fingerprints of a Technological Imaginary
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ted Hiebert is a Canadian visual artist, curator and theorist, and an Assistant Professor of Interdisciplinary Arts at the University of Washington Bothell. His artworks have been shown in Canada and abroad, most recently at Shift Collaborative Studio (Seattle, WA), the Xi’an Academy of Fine Art (Xi’an, China) and Truck Contemporary Art (Calgary, AB). Recent curatorial projects have included “More Often Than Always, Less Often Than Never,” (Richmond Art Gallery, Richmond BC) and the 2010 World Telekinesis Competition (Center for Serious Play, University of Washington Bothell, WA). He is the author of several articles and chapters on the imagination and digital culture, published in such journals as CTheory, The Psychoanalytic Review, Technoetic Arts and others. Hiebert is a member of the Editorial Board of CTheory. http://www.tedhiebert.net
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".