MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2291475076

Политика Петра i по переселению армян и грузин в Дагестан

2013· article· ru· W2291475076 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueИсторические, философские, политические и юридические науки, культурология и искусствоведение. Вопросы теории и практики · 2013
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Socio-Economic Development Trends
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeorgianArmenianQuarter (Canadian coin)Government (linguistics)PopulationPolitical scienceAncient historyHistoryGeographyEthnologySociologyDemographyArchaeologyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article sets the task to show the deliberate policy of Peter’s government on the resettlement of the Armenians and Georgians to the Caspian part of Dagestan in the first quarter of the XVIII th century, and reveals the reasons of the Russian authorities’ interest in the resettlement of the Christian population of Transcaucasia. It is mentioned that the Armenian-Georgian settlers were considered by the Russian authorities as a very important element of strengthening their positions in Dagestan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.360
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0110.012
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.007
Bibliometrics0.0050.011
Science and technology studies0.0100.010
Scholarly communication0.0090.011
Open science0.0160.006
Research integrity0.0080.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0630.090

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it