Cellular Polymer Ferroelectret: A Review on Their Development and Their Piezoelectric Properties
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Because of their ability to show ferroelectret behavior when exposed to an external electric field, cellular polymers have been recently considered for ferroelectret applications. These cellular polymer films can be produced by stretching or foaming, but depending on the application and conditions, different polymers, such as polypropylene (PP), poly(ethylene terephthalate), poly(ethylene naphthalate), poly(tetrafluoro ethylene), cross‐linked PP, and some cyclo‐olefines, have been considered. Nevertheless, cellular PP was the most investigated material because of its outstanding properties such as high piezoelectric d 33 coefficient, flexibility, good fatigue resistance, good charge trapping properties, and low cost. In this review, recent advances related to the materials used for ferroelectret applications and their processing are discussed. The effect of different parameters such as pressure, electrical breakdown strength of the gas phase, presence of fillers, and service temperature on the d 33 coefficient is presented and discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it