Design of bio-inspired computing technique for nanofluidics based on nonlinear Jeffery–Hamel flow equations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, stochastic numerical treatment is presented for boundary value problems (BVPs) arising in nanofluidics for nonlinear Jeffery–Hamel flow (NJ-HF) equations using feed-forward artificial neural networks (ANNs) optimized with bio-inspired computing based on genetic algorithms (GAs) integrated with the active-set method (ASM). NJ-HF equations associated with both convergent and divergent channels, involving nanoparticles, are derived from the transformation of Navier–Stokes partial differential equations to nonlinear BVPs of third-order ordinary differential equations. The mathematical model of the transformed BVPs is developed with the help of ANNs in an unsupervised manner and the design parameters of these networks are trained with GAs, ASM, and GA–ASM. The design scheme is evaluated for NJ-HF by taking water as a base fluid containing three different types of nanomaterials: copper (Cu), alumina (Al 2 O 3 ), and titania (TiO 2 ) under various scenarios based on the angle of the channels and Reynolds numbers. Accuracy and convergence of the designed scheme are validated through comparison with standard numerical results using the Adams method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".