MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ANGIOTENSIN II INDUCED APOPTOSIS IN ADULT CARDIOMYOCYTE IS SUPPRESSED BY ALL TRANS‐RETINOIC ACID

2009· article· en· W2291577724 on OpenAlexafffund
Anita Sharma, Sudha Thangirala, Sanjiv Dhingra, Ana Lüdke, Anju Bajaj, Pawan K. Singal

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
Canadian institutionsSt. Boniface Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsRetinoic acidAngiotensin IIEndocrinologyApoptosisInternal medicineMyocyteChemistryReceptorOxidative stressMAPK/ERK pathwaySignal transductionBiologyMedicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Circulatory levels of Angiotensin II (Ang II) and oxidative stress are increased in heart failure and both of these conditions are known to induce apoptosis. Vitamin A (retinol) is an important antioxidant and its uptake in the heart from plasma is increased in heart failure. Since vitamin A is metabolized to different bioactive molecules, most notably all trans‐retinoic acid (RA), we examined significance of RA in Ang II induced apoptosis in isolated adult cardiac myocytes. Ang II (10 −9 M) caused a significant increase in myocytes apoptosis and pre‐treatment with RA (10 −7 M) attenuated the morphological and biochemical markers of apoptosis. An increase in Bax / Bcl‐xl ratio by Ang II was prevented by RA. Ang II induced expression of phosphorylated ERK and JNK proteins was also modulated by RA. There was a moderate reduction in mRNA expression of c‐jun and c‐fos by RA treatment. Ang II treatment increased the levels of RXRs and pre‐treatment with RA lead to a reduction in the RXR levels and up‐ regulation of RAR receptors. RARs work in conjunction with RXRs and the present study indicates that low concentration of RA may activate only RAR receptors in cardiac myocytes in the presence of Ang II. The inhibitory effect of RA on the Ang II induced apoptosis in the cardiac myocytes is, thus, through a RAR‐dependent pathway. The results suggest that the interaction between RA and Ang II appears to be more complex than simple suppression of Ang II signaling (Supported by CIHR).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processesFrench-language works237,207