MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2291591995 · doi:10.14288/1.0061510

Studies of arsenicals in some marine algae of British Columbia

2009· article· en· W2291591995 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Abiodun A. Ojo

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicArsenic contamination and mitigation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlgaeOceanographyEnvironmental scienceEcologyBiologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arsenic determination in some marine algae of British Columbia was carried out by using Hydride Generation and Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometzy (HGAAS and GFAAS) following a two-hour wet digestion procedure. The total arsenic concentration in Fucus distichus and other brown algae determined by using the continuous HGAAS was found to vary with species and the collection sites, ranging from 1.8 μg/g As to 36.9 μg/g As (dry weight basis). Similarly, the arsenic concentrations determined in red algae were found to vary from a low 1.3 μg/g As to a high 39.7 μg/g As (also on a dry weight basis). Also, the arsenic concentrations determined in green algae were found to vary quite widely as in the other two classes of macroalgae, ranging from 0 μg/g As (not detected) to 27.2 μg/g As. These widely varying arsenic concentration results suggest that the amount of arsenic accumulated by seaweed is not only related to the class of the macroalgae as well as the particular species, but also to the sampling location and its soil conditions. Both the continuous HGAA and the semi-continuous HG-GC-AA techniques were employed for the examination of the selective reduction of four arsenic species, namely arsenate [As(V)], arsenite [As(III)], monomethylarsonic acid (MMAA) and dimethylarsinic acid (DMAA). The response profiles of the four arsenic species were plotted and the optimum arsenic analytical conditions were determined from these plots. By using a combination of extraction followed with sodium hydroxide digestion of the freeze dried seaweed, the reducible and “hidden” arsenic species in the extracts and digests were determined by using the semi-continuous mode HG-GC-AAS. Greater than 90% of the total arsenic in the seaweeds was found in the “hidden” arsenic forms. On-line detection techniques of High Performance Liquid Chromatography Microwave Oven Assisted Decomposition Hydride Generation Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (HPLC-Mic-HGAAS) and High Performance Liquid Chromatography Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (HPLC-ICPMS) were employed for the characterization of arsenic species in water soluble extract of F. distichus collected from Head of Hastings Arm, British Columbia. Prior to the use of these techniques for arsenic species identification, arsenic containing fractions were isolated via the use of several combinations of chromatographic procedures such as gel permeation chromatography (gpc), ion exchange chromatography (IEC), thin layer chromatography (tlc) and reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The water soluble extract of F. distichus was found to contain two major arsenosugars*, 11a and 11b, as well as several minor, unidentified arsenic species, likely to be other arsenosugar derivatives. The biotransformation studies of “hidden” organoarsenicals in F. distichus were carried out by using anaerobic decomposition conditions in “open” and “closed” systems. Two arsenic species, 2-dimethylarsinylethanol (DMAE) and dimethylarsiic acid (DMAA) were identified from the “open” system decomposition products by using the HPLC ICPMS technique. In the “closed” system, DMAE was characterized as a major decomposition product and DMAA was observed as another main component. Other minor arsenic species were found in the decomposition products, however, these were not identified. [chemical compound diagrams]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.231
Threshold uncertainty score0.464

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicArsenic contamination and mitigationFrench-language works237,207