MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2291625580 · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2015-312379.35

MOTOR NEURON DISEASE: A CASE OF MISGUIDED THERAPEUTIC NIHILISM

2015· article· en· W2291625580 on OpenAlexaff
Alexander M. Rossor, Dragana Josifova, Robin Howard, Alifa IsaacsItua

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA regulation and disease
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWeaknessMedicineDysphagiaMissense mutationMotor neuronDiseasePediatricsSurgeryFacial weaknessSwallowingInternal medicineGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the case of a 62 year old gentleman with sensorineuronal hearing loss beginning in the second decade. At the age of 40 he collapsed and was unable to walk more than a few metres. He was admitted to hospital and diagnosed with a motor neuron disease on the basis of an EMG. Examination at the time revealed bilateral deafness, facial weakness, dysphagia, dysphonia and both proximal and distal weakness. The family history was remarkable for two sisters who died of a similar condition in the second decade. In view of the combination of sensory neuronal deafness and a motor neuronopathy, a diagnosis of Brown Violetta Van Laera (BVVL) syndrome was made. A PEG tube was inserted and the patient was discharged to a nursing home for palliation. After several months, our patient discharged himself, reintroduced thickened fluids resulting in removal of the PEG tube. His clinical condition has continued to improve although he intermittently requires a wheelchair. Genetic testing of the SLC52A3 gene revealed two missense mutations (p.Glu36Lys and p.Val413Ala) confirming the clinical diagnosis of BVVL. SLC52A3 encodes a riboflavin transporter and in case series, riboflavin supplementation has halted or reversed the disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0070.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurology Neurosurgery & PsychiatrySame topicRNA regulation and diseaseFrench-language works237,207