Bibliographic record
Abstract
Data that differ significantly from the norm are considered outliers. Finding outliers from huge data repositories is akin to finding needles in a haystack. Even more challenging is searching for outliers from Web data repositories. The presence of outliers at every data repository cannot be denied in the data mining community of which the Web is not an exception. However, there is neither a formal definition nor known algorithms for mining Web outliers. Secondly, existing outlier mining algorithms designed solely for numeric data cannot be applied directly to mine outliers from Web datasets which contain data of different types (i.e., text, hypertext, video, audio, images, etc.). The thesis establishes the presence of outliers on the Web and provides motivation for mining them. It provides a taxonomy for Web outliers that supports the development of content specific algorithms for mining Web outliers. The thesis discusses a general framework for mining Web outliers but concentrates on designing models for mining Web content outliers. Three algorithms for mining Web content outliers are proposed. The WCOW-Mine algorithm is based on full keyword matching whereas WCON-Mine algorithm uses character n-grams for partial matching of strings. The third algorithm, HyCOQ, uses a hybrid of keywords and n-grams. With slight modifications all three algorithms can either use a domain dictionary or not. The HyCOQ algorithm eliminates the weaknesses in n-gram-based and keyword-based systems. The experimental results reveal all the algorithms are capable of finding Web content outliers. Further, HyCOQ shows huge improvements in accuracy over WCON-Mine and WCOW-Mine with embedded motifs. The results also show irrespective of the algorithm, mining Web content outliers without domain dictionary is more efficient than using one.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".