MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2291924956

Fair Trade Tea and Sustainable Development Among Indigenous Peoples of Amazonian Ecuador A Case Study

2013· article· en· W2291924956 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Samantha Wood

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal trade, sustainability, and social impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousAmazon rainforestProfit (economics)AmazonianEconomic growthSocioeconomicsBusinessPolitical scienceGeographySociologyEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Guayusa is a traditional tea found in the Amazon region of Ecuador. For generations the indigenous Kichwa people have been drinking it ceremonially in the morning hours to energize their bodies and souls. Historically, this tea has had immense cultural significance, but our research aimed to assess what guayusa means to modern-day Kichwas. Runa, a newly formed company, works with local farmers to cultivate and sell guayusa in the United States and Canada. With both a non-profit and a for-profit side of the company, Runa hopes to increase local income and standard of living while making a profit. As our host community embarked on the beginning stages of involvement with this company, we were interested to see how Runa operated in terms of cultural sensitivity, and assessed the cultural and financial implications of this project within the community. We conducted interviews to understand where guayusa fits into the daily life of the Kichwa people today, and how they feel about the Runa initiative. Ultimately we found that within this community,involvement with Runa is mutually beneficial. Indigenous farmers see it as one of a variety of economic initiatives that bring in money in an ecofriendly and culturally acceptable way.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.129

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.437
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicGlobal trade, sustainability, and social impact→French-language works237,207→