MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W229193929 · doi:10.3138/cjfs.13.1.2

Room-for-Play: Beniamin's Gamble with Cinema the Martin Walsh Memorial Lecture 2003 Résumé:

2004· article· fr· W229193929 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Miriam Hansen

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Film Studies · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCinema and Media Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesESPACEArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans la deuxième version de son article « L'œuvre d'art à l'époque de sa reproduction mécanisée » (1936), Walter Benjamin note que l'anéantissement de l'aura ou apparence (Scbein) dans l'art s'accompagne d’une augmentation énorme de « l'espace de jeu » (Spielraum) surtout, et grâce, au cinéma. Cet article examine les nombreuses connotations du terme allemand Spiel chez Benjamin-le jeu d'enfant, le jeu de l'acteur, le jeu de hasard--et étudie sa notion du cinéma comme jeu en relation avec sa théorie anthropologique-matérialiste de la technologie. De là découle l'importance à la fois esthétique et politique du cinéma en tant que forme de jeu de « seconde nature » .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.779
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Film StudiesSame topicCinema and Media StudiesFrench-language works237,207