MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2291948415 · doi:10.14288/1.0088148

Anatomical, biomechanical and behavioural characteristics of the human masseter muscle

2009· article· en· W2291948415 on OpenAlexaff
Monica de Lorenzo Tonndorf

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Collections · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicTemporomandibular Joint Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMasseter muscleAnatomyOrthodonticsPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is little information on the anatomical and functional organization of the human jaw muscles, despite their importance to the masticatory system and disorders which affect it. The current studies examined the anatomical, biomechanical and functional characteristics in the multipennate human masseter muscle as a model for understanding function in the human jaw. Masseter anatomy was investigated in fetuses, adult cadavers, and living subjects by histology, gross anatomical dissection and Magnetic-Resonance (MR) imaging. Nerve pathways and muscle-fibre arrangements suggested that both fetal and adult muscles could be divided into at least four neuromuscular compartments. Although some fetal specimens had developed peimation, internal aponeuroses were seldom present. Structural variations were also found in the cadaveric material and living subjects. As the number of aponeuroses increased with development, and their thickness varied between individuals, individualized contraction strategies are likely to occur during function. Movements of masseter insertion sites during jaw function were modelled in dry skulls. Muscle origins and insertions were measured three-dimensionally at different gapes and simulated masticatory positions. Their movements varied with craniofacial dimensions and their locations on the mandible. For some parts of the muscle, the balancing-side and the incisal-contact positions provided the most advantageous lines of muscle fibre action, while for others, the working-side task was most favourable. Separate portions of the muscle are thus uniquely placed to perform specific tasks. Movements of four insertion sites were also recorded in four living subjects. Insertion areas were identified on MR-derived reconstructions, and movements recorded with a jaw-tracking device. Ranges of insertion displacement were similar to these estimated for dry skulls, and varied between individuals. Interference electromyography, and single-motor-unit (MU) techniques were used to study physiological responses in eight subjects. The behaviour of low-threshold MUs was investigated relative to changes in bite side and experimental paradigm while subjects were biting on a force transducer. For each unit, the recruitment threshold, sustained-bite forces, the rate and regularity of sustained firing, and the coefficient of variation, were measured. Assessments were also made of the accuracy with which the target rates were attained, and of the contribution of each MU’s firing rate to bite force. These measures of behaviour frequently differed between tasks, but not reproducibly. The highest reproducibility and firing-rate accuracy were achieved when visual and auditory MU feedback was provided. A tendency for increased firing rate, and decreased discharge variability was found when subjects had no feedback. As approximately 50% of the units did not show reproducible behavioural characteristics, it seems that differences in intramuscular activation, differential activation of other muscles, and the inherent variability seen in low-threshold MU studies generally make quantitative comparisons of focal activity in the masseter implausible. Finally, a method was developed for locating the positions of moving needle electrodes relative to internal aponeuroses. It combined scanning electromyography, optical tracking of electrodes, MR imaging, and three-dimensional reconstruction. The territorial sizes of 162 MUs were then assessed in the muscles of four subjects. Their mean width was 3.7 ± 2.3 mm. Most MU territories were confined between tendons, although 10% of the units clearly extended across at least one tendon. This focal dispersion of most territories provides a firm anatomical basis for selective activation of the muscle. The findings collectively indicate an anatomical, biomechanical and physiological basis for differential motor control of at least four neuromuscular compartments in the human masseter muscle. The extent to which the central nervous system selectively activates these compartments, or coactivates them, remains to be demonstrated under functional conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen CollectionsSame topicTemporomandibular Joint DisordersFrench-language works237,207