Top-k nearest neighbor search in uncertain data series
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many real applications consume data that is intrinsically uncertain, noisy and error-prone. In this study, we investigate the problem of finding the top- k nearest neighbors in uncertain data series, which occur in several different domains. We formalize the top- k nearest neighbor problem for uncertain data series, and describe a model for uncertain data series that captures both uncertainty and correlation. This distinguishes our approach from prior work that compromises the accuracy of the model by assuming independence of the value distribution at neighboring time-stamps. We introduce the Holistic-PkNN algorithm, which uses novel metric bounds for uncertain series and an efficient refinement strategy to reduce the overall number of required probability estimates. We evaluate our proposal under a variety of settings using a combination of synthetic and 45 real datasets from diverse domains. The results demonstrate the significant advantages of the proposed approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it