MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2292015157 · doi:10.1145/2820783.2820791

Graphast

2015· article· en· W2292015157 on OpenAlexaff
Régis Pires Magalhães, Gustavo Coutinho, José Antônio Fernandes de Macêdo, Camila F. Roncari, Lívia Almada Cruz, Mário A. Nascimento

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Management and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceOrder (exchange)Distributed computingData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Graphast is a framework tool that allows developers to compose a number of network models, data importing/exporting services as well as query services, in order to quickly build applications on time-dependent networks. The main goal is to allow developers to implement solutions to different types of problems on time-dependent networks using spatial queries, such as nearest neighbor queries, optimal sequenced routes, etc. Graphast allows the combination of facilities provided by the framework via a public API and/or the building of new facilities, e.g., a new query processing algorithm, and incorporate those into Graphast for others to use them as well. In this paper, we discuss Graphast's architectural components and how one can create/store instances of those components in order to build an application. The steps necessary for building a real world application are also presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0550.037

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicData Management and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207