Photoluminescence Study of an Er-Doped Si-Rich SiO[sub x] Film
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have studied photoluminescence (PL) from samples of Er-doped Si-rich silicon oxide (SRSO) annealed at for in , (FG1), (FG2), and , respectively, or subjected to double-step annealing processes. For the given film composition, the PL spectra of the samples annealed in , FG1, or FG2 are similar in shape but reveal small differences in the intensities of emission bands; while the spectra are qualitatively different in the case of oxidation. By combining the treatments of oxidation and annealing in FG1, the PL intensity of the SRSO matrix increases significantly; the emission from Si nanoclusters (Si-ncls) is also enhanced while the PL remains efficient. The effects of annealing gas ambients are discussed in terms of hydrogen passivation, Si oxynitridation and/or oxidation occurring in the film upon annealing and play different roles in the PL.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".