MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2292043425

TÜRKİYE MEB VE ONTARIO (KANADA) EYALETİ FEN VE TEKNOLOJİ DERSİ ÖĞRETİM PROGRAMLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILARAK DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

2010· article· tr· W2292043425 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Erhan Ekici

Bibliographic record

VenueEducation Sciences · 2010
Typearticle
Languagetr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Leadership and Administration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumGrading (engineering)Christian ministryPsychologyClass (philosophy)Mathematics educationPedagogyPolitical scienceComputer scienceEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, Ministry of National Education 2004 Science and Technology Curriculum and Canadian Ontario State 1998 Science and Technology Curriculum have been evaluated by comparing the approach which is based, content, purpose, learning-teaching process, evaluating and assessment process. At the end of the research, differences have been found with regard to class levels of curriculums, learning areas, dispersal of learning areas according to the class levels, curriculum purposes, numbers of acquisition and grading of acquisition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.359
Threshold uncertainty score0.722

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEducation SciencesSame topicEducational Leadership and AdministrationFrench-language works237,207