ÍNDICE DE QUALIDADE DE ÁGUA (IQACCME) APLICADO À AVALIAÇÃO DE AQUÍFEROS DO ESTADO DO RIO DE JANEIRO WATER QUALITY INDEX (CCMEWQI) APPLIED FOR EVALUATION OF GROUNDWATER OF THE STATE OF RIO DE JANEIRO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The quality of some aquifers of Rio de Janeiro State was evaluated by applying, in 168 samples, the Water Quality Index (WQI) developed by the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) in 1997. The maximum allowable values for the parameters were mostly those established by Brazilian Environ- mental Council CONAMA Resolution 396/08 for human consumption. The index was calculated with two compositions: a) Na + , Fe, Al, SO4 2- , Mn, NO3 - and Cl - and b) these and other cations, anions, pH and thermo- tolerant coliforms. The results of the two compositions differ. In general, the waters of Southern Rio de Janeiro State have the best rates, around 70% of the samples within the classes qualified as excellent and good. The opposite occurred with the waters of the Northwest and Coastal North and Eastern Rio de Janeiro, where most of the samples were ranked between regular and very bad.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".