MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Intrathoracic neurons modify myocardial ischemia‐induced sudden cardiac death

2010· article· en· W2292256300 on OpenAlexaff
Jeffrey L. Ardell, E. Marie Southerland, J. Andrew Armour

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Canadian institutionsHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMicrodialysisIschemiaCardiologyInternal medicineSudden cardiac deathAnesthesiaCoronary occlusionSpinal cordNorepinephrineCentral nervous systemDopamine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To determine if cardiac sympathetic intrathoracic reflexes represent a risk factor for ischemia‐induced sudden cardiac death (SCD) and, if so, whether targeting them reduces that risk. Left ventricular (LV) interstitial fluid (ISF) norepinephrine (NE) levels were assessed by microdialysis in anesthetized canines during transient coronary artery occlusion (CAO). Responses in animals with intact neuroaxes were compared to those in which the intrathoracic component of the cardiac neuronal hierarchy was surgically disconnected from central neurons vs those with intact neuroaxis that underwent spinal cord stimulation (SCS; T1‐T3 spinal level). In intact preparations, animals exhibiting enhanced NE ISF levels with increased dispersion between ischemic and border zone were at increased risk for SCD. Following intrathoracic neuronal decentralization, CAO induced NE release was reduced ~20% and uniform across the ischemic to border zones. Following intrinsic cardiac neuronal decentralization, CAO induced NE release occurred only in ischemic tissue. SCS also reduced CAO‐induced NE release (~60% vs control). Risk for CAO‐induced SCD was 42% in control, 8% following decentralization and 10% with SCS. These data demonstrate that stabilization of intrathoracic nervous system by such means reduces the potential for ischemia‐induced SCD while maintaining regulatory function. HL71830

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlFrench-language works237,207