MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2292351144 · doi:10.5964/ejop.v12i1.1133

Living creatively, in and through institutions

2016· article· en· W2292351144 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tania Zittoun

Bibliographic record

VenueEurope’s Journal of Psychology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCreativity in Education and Neuroscience
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDownloadLicenseCitationLibrary scienceAttributionPolitical scienceComputer scienceWorld Wide WebPsychologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Living Creatively, In and Through Institutions Authors Tania Zittoun University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland Abstract No abstract available. PDF HTML Article info Impact Citations How to Cite License Published at 29. February 2016 https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v12i1.1133 Issue: Vol. 12 No. 1 (2016) Section: Editorial Share: Z Zittoun, T. (2016). Living Creatively, In and Through Institutions. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 12(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v12i1.1133 More Citation Formats ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver Download Citation Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 3.0 International License. PlumX Dimensions Views: Total Abstract PDF HTML 992 440 494 58 Downloads: Download data is not yet available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.273
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.135
GPT teacher head0.460
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEurope’s Journal of PsychologySame topicCreativity in Education and NeuroscienceFrench-language works237,207