MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2292356203 · doi:10.2118/179174-ms

Interwell Hydraulic Fracture Interaction Between Multistage Stimulated Wells and a Multi Zone Slant Open Hole Observation Well Placed in the Canadian Horn River Basin

2016· article· en· W2292356203 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsNexen (Canada)
FundersNERC Environmental Bioinformatics Centre
KeywordsGeologyDrillingCompletion (oil and gas wells)Petroleum engineeringFracture (geology)Natural gasHydraulic fracturingBoreholeWater wellOil shaleWell loggingDirectional drillingMining engineeringGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringGroundwater

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper presents well construction details and pressure responses for a slant well in a dry gas shale resource in northern British Columbia, Canada. We will present the drilling and completions plan for a Multi-Stage Hydraulic Fracturing (MSHF) campaign on a ten well half pad including consequences of an aggressive fluid environment. Horn River shale gas development involves Multi-well MSHF horizontal wells from a single surface pad location. The wells are treated sequentially from toe to heel of the horizontal section, alternating between wells. Strategic placement of an Open Hole (OH) slant well equipped with slotted liner, tubing, and pressure data recorders will be presented. Pressure responses during the MSHF campaign will be presented and reviewed against calibrated closure pressure data from Diagnostic Fracture Injection Test (DFIT) data and end of job instantaneous shut-in pressures (ISIP). The initial concept of drilling an OH well placed between MSHF wells was to evaluate the fracture system between stimulated wells and to test whether an unstimulated open hole well placed between stimulated wells can economically produce gas. Other objectives were to provide an Oil Based drilling Mud (OBM) free wellbore that would enable water-based imaging logs. Water-based logs have enhanced ability to identify and map natural fractures. Initial logs would evaluate the natural fractures and subsequent post-completion logs would evaluate the hydraulic fracture transiting the shale resource rock to the OH well. Knowledge of how pre-existing natural fracture networks react to the hydraulic fracture process along with pressure response data recorded from all wells on the pad would be used to provide geoscientists and engineers the means to optimize stimulation programs for horizontal wells and wellbore placement within the various resource reservoirs in the Horn River Basin. This paper will discuss the compromises that were made to the initial conceptual model that maximized learnings from the slant OH wellbore, and how the well was unexpectedly lost. Pressure interference data for future hydraulic fracturing models will be provided along with methods to describe how hydraulic fractures from nearby wells transect a well and interact with various reservoirs exposed within the OH segment of a slant wellbore.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.318
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it