MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2292408058 · doi:10.2390/biecoll-icvs2007-59

Maximum-Likelihood Stereo Correspondence using Field Programmable Gate Arrays

2019· article· en· W2292408058 on OpenAlexaff
Siraj Sabihuddin, W. James MacLean

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField-programmable gate arraySoftwareGate arraySoftware implementationComputer scienceFrame rateFrame (networking)ImplementationField (mathematics)StereopsisComputer hardwareArtificial intelligenceComputer visionMaximum likelihoodAlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Estimation of depth within an imaged scene can be formulated as a stereo correspondence problem. Typical software approaches tend to be too slow for real time performance on high frame rate (>= 30fps) stereo acquisition systems. Hardware implementations of these same algorithms allow for parallelization, providing a marked improvement in performance. This paper will explore one such hardware implementation of a maximum-likelihood stereo correspondence algorithm on a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA). The proposed ""FastTrack"" hardware implementation is a first stage prototype that demonstrates comparable results to an equivalent software implementation. with the advantage of high-speed (eventually up to 200fps) stereo depth estimation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score0.876

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Vision and ImagingFrench-language works237,207