Bibliographic record
Abstract
The seminal paper by Niels Bohr followed by a paper by Arnold Sommerfeld led to a revolutionary Bohr–Sommerfeld theory of atomic spectra. We are interested in the information about the structure of quantum mechanics encoded in this theory. In particular, we want to extend Bohr–Sommerfeld theory to a full quantum theory of completely integrable Hamiltonian systems, which is compatible with geometric quantization. In the general case, we use geometric quantization to prove analogues of the Bohr–Sommerfeld quantization conditions for the prequantum operators Pf. If a prequantum operator Pf satisfies the Bohr–Sommerfeld conditions and if it restricts to a directly quantized operator Qf in the representation corresponding to the polarization F, then Qf also satisfies the Bohr–Sommerfeld conditions. The proof that the quantum spherical pendulum is a quantum system of the type we are looking for requires a new treatment of the classical action functions and their properties. For the sake of completeness we have provided an extensive presentation of the classical spherical pendulum. In our approach to Bohr–Sommerfeld theory, which we call Bohr–Sommerfeld–Heisenberg quantization, we define shifting operators that provide transitions between different quantum states. Moreover, we relate these shifting operators to quantization of functions on the phase space of the theory. We use Bohr–Sommerfeld–Heisenberg theory to study the properties of the quantum spherical pendulum, in particular, the boundary conditions for the shifting operators and quantum monodromy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".