Bridging the Gap: Integrating HIV Prevention into Sexual and Reproductive Health Promotion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Planned Parenthood Federation of Canada (PPFC) is the only non-governmental organization (NGO) in Canada that provides services information and counselling exclusively on sexual and reproductive health. In December 2000 PPFC received project funding from the HIV/AIDS Prevention and Community Action Program (ACAP) at Health Canada. The project goal is to develop a resource that would allow Planned Parenthood affiliates to better recognize and serve both women at risk for HIV as well as HIV positive women. The first phase of this project involves an examination of the historical separation of HIV and sexual and reproductive health promotion and the recent attempts to reintegrate HIV prevention under the broader umbrella of sexual and reproductive health. This article will explore the reasons for the split between HIV and sexual and reproductive health planning programming and services namely the origins of the family planning movement ideology around female sexuality and the association of HIV with the gay community as well as homophobia and stigma. It will conclude by examining some of the recent research that supports bridging this gap. (excerpt)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.027 | 0.047 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.020 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".