Generalised selection at multi‐antenna sources in two‐way relay networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A generalised selection transmission (GST) and generalised selection combining (GSC) scheme is proposed for two‐way relay networks where two multi‐antenna sources exchange information via a single‐antenna relay. New exact and asymptotic expressions are derived for the outage probability and symbol error rate (SER) in Rayleigh fading. Moreover, a tight upper bound on the ergodic sum‐rate is presented. These results are used to demonstrate that the proposed GST/GSC scheme preserves the full diversity order, which equals the minimum number of antennas at the two sources. It is also shown that the impact of the number of selected antennas lies in the array gain only. Furthermore, the GST/GSC scheme significantly improves the performance relative to single‐antenna selection, and only incurs a negligible reduction in performance relative to all‐antenna beamforming. Finally, the optimal relay location that minimises the SER is determined analytically. It is observed that the optimal relay location shifts towards one source when the number of selected or available antennas at the other source increases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".