Response of Yearling Quarter Horses to Varying Concentrations of Dietary Calcium
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Fifteen yearling Quarter Horses were used in a split-plot designed experiment to determine the effects of three concentrations of Ca on mineral metabolism, bone density, and parameters of growth. Horses were blocked by sex and BW and randomly assigned to one of three dietary treatments that were formulated to contain 115, 100, and 85% of NRC (10) requirements for Ca. Diets consisted of ground corn, soybean meal, and cottonseed hulls fed at a 70:30 with native prairie grass hay at 2.5% BW. The 25-wk trial consisted of three 72-h collection periods at d 0 (Period 1), d 90 (Period 2), and d 180 (Period 3) during which complete urine and fecal collections were taken. Additionally, radiographs of the left front cannon were taken 1 wk prior to each collection for determination of bone density. Data were analyzed with horse and treatment as main effects. Results from this study demonstrated an increased Ca retention with increased intake during all three periods. There was, however, no radiographic evidence of treatment effect on bone density.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it