Prestations d'aide sociale chez les demandeurs du statut de refugie au Canada : donnees tirees de fichiers de donnees administratives couples
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les demandeurs du statut de refugie ou demandeurs d'asile representent une part importante de la population de residents non permanents du Canada. Le Canada a accorde la residence permanente a environ 12 000 a 16 000 refugies chaque annee au cours de la deuxieme moitie des annees 2000, et environ 115 000 a 130 000 demandeurs d'asile residaient au Canada a un moment ou a un autre chaque annee au cours de cette periode. En depit du volume de demandeurs d'asile, on savait tres peu de choses au sujet des caracteristiques economiques de ces personnes jusqu'à maintenant. Le present rapport utilise de nouveaux fichiers de donnees administratives couples pour fournir des renseignements sur le versement de prestations d'aide sociale (AS) dans cette population. l'etude a permis de coupler environ les trois quarts de tous les demandeurs d'asile a des fichiers administratifs comprenant des renseignements sur le versement annuel de prestations d'AS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.012 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".