Bibliographic record
Abstract
ISBN 9-782845-166073, 25€. 1 Ce gros volume regroupe vingt-quatre communications autour d'un des thèmes qui avait été illustré en roman par Nicolas-Edme Restif de la Bretonne, Les nuits de la Révolution française.Notons également que l'un des contributeurs, Alain Cabantous, a publié chez Fayard en 2009 une Histoire de la nuit (XVII e -XVIII e siècles), Dominique Bertrand a dirigé chez Champion en 2003 un Penser la nuit, recueil d'actes d'un colloque de littéraires, et Simone Delattre a publié en 2000, chez Albin Michel, Les douze heures noires.La nuit à Paris au XIX e siècle.On trouvera des références bibliographiques plus nombreuses dans la longue introduction rédigée par Philippe Bourdin sous le titre « Fenêtres sur la nuit » (p.11-26).Mais c'est encore la revue Sociétés et représentations qui a été pionnière en publiant dès 1997 un numéro spécial consacré à « La nuit » sous la direction de Véronique Nahoum-Grappe et de Myriam Tsikounas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".