MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Investigation of the role of 10Li resonances in the halo structure of 11Li through the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" altimg="si1.gif" overflow="scroll"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Li</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Li</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math> transfer reaction

2016· article· lv· W2292634734 on OpenAlexafffund
A. Sanetullaev, R. Kanungo, Junki Tanaka, M. Alcorta, C. Andreoiu, P. C. Bender, A. A. Chen, G. Christian, B. Davids, J. Fallis, Jean‐Paul Fortin, N. Galinski, A. T. Gallant, P. E. Garrett, G. Hackman, B. Hadinia, S. Ishimoto, Matthew Keefe, R. Krücken, J. C. Lighthall, E. McNeice, D. Miller, J. E. Purcell, J.S. Randhawa, T. Roger, A. Rojas, H. Savajols, A.C. Shotter, I. Tanihata, I. J. Thompson, C. Unsworth, P. Voss, Zhiyue Wang

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics Letters B · 2016
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of GuelphUniversité LavalMcMaster UniversityTRIUMFSimon Fraser UniversitySaint Mary's University
FundersLawrence Livermore National LaboratoryNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for InnovationTRIUMFNova Scotia Research Innovation TrustU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPhysicsHaloNeutronResonance (particle physics)Ground stateNuclear physicsAtomic physicsAstrophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Here, the first measurement of the one-neutron transfer reaction <sup>11</sup>Li(p,d)<sup>10</sup>Li performed using the IRIS facility at TRIUMF with a 5.7A MeV<sup>11</sup>Li beam interacting with a solid H<sub>2</sub> target is reported. The <sup>10</sup>Li residue was populated strongly as a resonance peak with energy E<sub>r</sub> = 0.62 ± 0.04 MeV having a total width Γ = 0.33 ± 0.07 MeV. The angular distribution of this resonance is characterized by neutron occupying the 1p<sub>1/2</sub> orbital. A DWBA analysis yields a spectroscopic factor of 0.67 ± 0.12 for p<sub>1/2</sub> removal strength from the ground state of <sup>11</sup>Li to the region of the peak.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.895
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.006
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.008
Scholarly communication0.0040.007
Open science0.0090.007
Research integrity0.0060.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4520.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics Letters BSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207