MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2292740158 · doi:10.1161/atvb.35.suppl_1.327

Abstract 327: Liver X Receptors (LXR) Modulate the Negative Effects on Endothelial Progenitors Cells after Feeding a High Cholesterol Diet

2015· article· en· W2292740158 on OpenAlexaff
Adil Rasheed, Carolyn L. Cummins

Bibliographic record

VenueArteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicAtherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiver X receptorProgenitor cellABCA1HaematopoiesisEndocrinologyInternal medicineCholesterolBiologyStem cellABCG1EndotheliumBone marrowCancer researchNuclear receptorCell biologyImmunologyMedicineTranscription factorTransporterBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The liver X receptors (LXRα/β) belong to the nuclear receptor superfamily of ligand activated transcription factors. LXRs are endogenously activated by oxysterols; and one of their primary functions is to facilitate cholesterol efflux out of cells, such as macrophages, via the ABCA1 & ABCG1 transporters. Bone marrow (BM) transplant studies have shown that LXRs are important for preventing the formation of atherosclerotic plaques. Loss of LXRs in the monocyte/macrophage population of the BM was thought to be the primary mediator of the increased atherosclerosis in these studies. However, the BM is comprised of a variety of cell types that are differentiated from hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). Like numerous other vascular complications, endothelial defects are central to the pathogenesis of the early stages of atherosclerosis. Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), derived from HSCs in the BM, contribute to vascular health primarily through the secretion of factors that maintain and repair the endothelium of the damaged vasculature. We hypothesized that LXRs also modulate the negative effects of cholesterol on EPCs, in addition to its effects in macrophages. To study the effects of dietary cholesterol on EPCs and the roles of LXRs in modulating these effects, WT and LXRα/β-/- mice were fed a high-fat/high-cholesterol (HF/HC) diet starting at 8-9 weeks of age for a total of 12 weeks. Complete blood counts showed that in the LXRα/β-/- but not the WT mice fed the HF/HC diet, there was a significant expansion of select myeloid populations (neutrophils, monocytes, platelets). Furthermore, EPCs derived from the HF/HC fed LXRα/β-/- mice had a higher expression of the endothelial markers CD144 and VEGFR2 compared to WT mice and LXRα/β-/- mice on chow diet, suggesting enhanced differentiation to a more endothelial-like cell in the absence of LXRs. Notably, the paracrine reparative actions of EPCs have been shown in populations of cells with low expression of endothelial markers. Taken together, these results suggest that LXRs modulate the effects of HF/HC diet on the differentiation of EPCs to endothelial cells and thus, may provide another cell type within the BM that would benefit from LXR activation in modulating vascular disease.[[Unable to Display Character: ]]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular BiologySame topicAtherosclerosis and Cardiovascular DiseasesFrench-language works237,207