"A Case Study in progress: The role of Memorial University's School of Social Work in the context of Aboriginal self-government in Newfoundland and Labrador"
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Newfoundland and Labrador, like other regions in Canada, is in a period of social \ntransformation due to a number of processes to resolve outstanding political and socio-economic \nissues with the province's Aboriginal peoples. In addition, major initiatives in the \nregion such as the Davis Inlet relocation and the development of the mega Voisey's Bay nickel \ndeposit pose significant social risks and opportunities. Greater political autonomy and \nself-determination for the Aboriginal governments also creates obligation and responsibility \nfor the social welfare of their citizens. What is the place for the social work profession, \nAboriginal social workers and for Memorial University of Newfoundland's School of Social Work \nduring this era of profound social change? This article explores the concurrent journeys of the \nAboriginal peoples of the province, the School of Social Work, and an Aboriginal social \nwork student as each grapple for meaning and relevance in building a new more socially just \nreality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.056 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".