MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat (SHR) Display Alterations in Carbohydrate Metabolism And Function At An Early Age

2009· article· en· W2293013200 on OpenAlexafffund
Benjamin Lauzier, F. Labarthe, Bertrand Bouchard, Janie McDuff, Roselle Gélinas, Sylvain Foisy, Guy Charron, Christine Des Rosiers

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart Institute
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchFondation Bettencourt Schueller
KeywordsEndocrinologyInternal medicinePDK4Carbohydrate metabolismSpontaneously hypertensive ratCD36Beta oxidationMetabolismGlycolysisAfterloadMuscle hypertrophyChemistryGene expressionMedicineVentricleGeneBlood pressureBiochemistryReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The SHR, a genetic model of hypertension with a CD36 gene defect, develops left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) between 9 and 12 weeks of age. We reported that 15‐wk‐old SHR display a reduced exogenous fatty acid (FA) oxidation, while that of carbohydrate (CHO) was unchanged despite an enhanced glycolysis. This study aimed at clarifying whether these alterations are characteristic of this rat strain or result from metabolic gene remodeling linked to LVH. We assessed the metabolic and functional profile of working hearts perfused with 13 C‐labeled substrates at 7 weeks (SHR vs Wistar), and cardiac metabolic gene expression by qPCR at 7 and 15 weeks. As young Wistar hearts were not able to maintain stable cardiac output at 80 mmHg, they were perfused at 70 mmHg afterload to match functions with SHR. At the metabolic level, SHR hearts displayed a 40% lower FA β‐oxidation, while CHO oxidation was increased by 50% (p<0.05). qPCR data revealed that SHR hearts showed marginal differences in mRNA levels for genes involved in FA and CHO metabolism at 7 weeks, but a significant increase in all these gene transcripts at 15 weeks. Compared to their 15‐week‐old counterpart, young SHR hearts displayed a similar lower FA oxidation, but an increase in CHO oxidation. The latter difference appears to be explained by transcriptional changes in PDK4 linked to LVH, and may confer to young SHR hearts the capacity to withstand a higher workload. (Supported by the Fondation Bettencourt Schueller and CIHR).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→