Structure–Activity Relationship Studies of Isomeric 2,4-Diaminoquinazolines on β-Amyloid Aggregation Kinetics
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A library of isomeric 2,4-diaminoquinazoline (DAQ) derivatives were synthesized and evaluated for antiaggregation potential toward Aβ40/42. Structure-activity relationship data identified compound 3k (N (4)-(4-bromobenzyl)quinazoline-2,4-diamine) with a 4-bromobenzyl substituent as the most potent inhibitor (Aβ40 IC50 = 80 nM) and was almost 18-fold more potent compared to the reference agent curcumin (Aβ40 IC50 = 1.5 μM). The corresponding N (2)-isomer 4k (N (2)-(4-bromobenzyl)quinazoline-2,4-diamine) was also able to prevent Aβ aggregation (Aβ40 IC50 = 1.7 μM). However, compound 4k exhibited superior inhibition of Aβ42 aggregation (Aβ42 IC50 = 1.7 μM) compared to compound 3k (Aβ42 IC50 = 14.8 μM) and was ∼1.8-fold more potent compared to curcumin (Aβ42 IC50 = 3.1 μM). These results were supported by Aβ aggregation kinetics investigations and transmission electron microscopy studies, which demonstrate the suitability of DAQ ring system to develop antiamyloid agents as pharmacological tools to study Aβ aggregation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it