Early Ocean Life History of Harrison River Sockeye Salmon and their Contribution to the Biodiversity of Sockeye Salmon in the Fraser River, British Columbia, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract During a study of the early marine survival of Chinook Salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha and Coho Salmon O. kisutch in the Strait of Georgia from 1998 to 2010, moderate abundances of juvenile Sockeye Salmon O. nerka were observed to remain in the strait much longer than previously thought. In 2008, DNA stock identification showed that these juveniles were from the Harrison River, a population with a sea‐type life history in which juveniles enter the ocean during the year of emergence from the gravel. Using information collected in 1998–2010, we describe the early ocean life and production of Harrison River sea‐type Sockeye Salmon. Juveniles entered the Strait of Georgia from the Fraser River over an extended period, with most entering after mid‐July—about 8 weeks later than lake‐type juveniles, which had virtually all left the strait by that time. The September diets of sea‐type juveniles were highly selective for hyperiid amphipods, which were not abundant in the zooplankton. Interaction with juvenile Pink Salmon O. gorbuscha during this early marine period was identified as potentially affecting the age structure of returning adults. Juvenile Sockeye Salmon remained in the strait until the fall and then moved offshore, where they remained until returning as age‐3 or age‐4 adults. There was a strong positive relationship between the September CPUE of juveniles in the Strait of Georgia and the total adult return of Harrison River Sockeye Salmon, indicating that total production in recent years was likely related to conditions in the strait. From 2005 to 2011, Harrison River Sockeye Salmon production exhibited a large increase in comparison with the total production of Sockeye Salmon in the Fraser River system. This recent increase in production of late‐ocean‐entering juveniles with a sea‐type life history identifies the importance of managing for biodiversity of Sockeye Salmon populations within the Fraser River drainage. Received April 28, 2015; accepted November 17, 2015
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".