Internationaal arbeidsrecht gemangeld tussen vrij verkeer van personen, vrij verkeer van diensten, vrijheid van vestiging en non-discriminatie. Enkele aantekeningen vanuit ipr-perspectief bij de uitspraken Viking, Laval, Rüffert en C./Luxemburg (International Labour Law Oppressed between Freedom of Movement, Freedom of Services, Freedom of Establishment and Non-Discrimination - Some Considerations from a Private International Law Perspective on the Recent Judgments Viking, Laval, Rüffert and C…
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dutch Abstract: In commentaren bij enkele recente, ophefmakende uitspraken van het Hof van Justitie (Viking, Laval, Ruffert en C./Luxemburg) werd tot nog toe weinig aandacht gegeven aan aspecten van internationaal privaatrecht (ipr). In deze bijdrage wordt besproken welke rol het ipr speelt c.q. kan spelen in de spanning die momenteel wordt onderkend tussen zogenaamde economische en sociale Europese doelstellingen (uitgebreide versie van de in TRA gepubliceerde versie).English Abstract: In this article the author focuses on the Private International Law issues raised by the judgements of the Court of Justice in the cases, Viking, Laval, Ruffert and C./Luxembourg. The approach is the following: the country of principle created an intense controversy when it was presented as part of the proposal of the European Commission for a Directive on Services in the internal market (COM(2004)final, 13.1.2004). In the final version of the Services Directive, the principle has disappeared. But the question arises whether the principle of origin has resurrected in the recent judgments of the Court? In her discussion of this issue and the impact of the liberalization of the provision of services in the EU, the author includes the Rome Convention, The Rome I Regulation and the Posting Directive.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".