Analysis of the potential institutional demand in processed desserts for British Columbia tree fruits
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The tree fruits industry in British Columbia distributes its products in both fresh and processed forms. The processed fruit industry, through Sun-Rype Products Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of B.C. Tree Fruits Limited, is an important and profitable part of the tree fruits industry in British Columbia. Expansion of this industry, however, depends upon finding new market opportunities. The purpose of this paper was to gather information on the size and characteristics of the British Columbian institutional market for frozen fruit-based desserts. Such an investigation appeared essential given the facts that the number of processed fruit products were very limited and institutions were increasing both their share of the food dollar and their consumption of frozen foods. Obtaining the necessary information involved the collecting of all relevant published data as well as the conducting of personal interviews. The published data were limited but did provide both a general background on the institutions' food requirements and statistics on gross sales. To break these gross statistics down into more meaningful potential dessert sales required interviewing several Greater Vancouver institutions. These interviews provided data on various food costs and more detailed information on dessert requirements. The results of the investigation indicated that the demand of the British Columbian institutional market for frozen fruit-based desserts was not large but the costs of producing, marketing, and shipping such desserts would also have to be examined before a final decision to enter or not to enter the market was made.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".