MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2293163980 · doi:10.1097/mca.0000000000000365

Comparison of long-term prognostic value of baseline SYNTAX and clinical SYNTAX scores in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease

2016· article· en· W2293163980 on OpenAlex
Tolga Onuk, Barış Güngör, Göktürk İpek, Mehmet Baran Karataş, Yiğit Çanga, Şükrü Akyüz, Recep Hacı, Fatma Özpamuk Karadeniz, Aylin Sungur, Hülya Kaşıkçıoğlu, Neşe Çam

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCoronary Artery Disease · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Association for the Study of the Liver
KeywordsMedicineConventional PCIMaceCardiologyInternal medicinePercutaneous coronary interventionMyocardial infarctionCoronary artery diseaseRevascularization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of baseline SYNTAX (SS) and clinical SYNTAX (cSS) scores has been shown in different populations with coronary artery disease. However, their prognostic value has not been compared in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease. METHODS: Patients who had undergone a primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for STEMI and had at least one critical lesion other than the culprit artery were recruited retrospectively. SS and cSS were calculated from medical records and angiograms and were compared in coronary artery by-pass grafting (CABG) and PCI groups. Long-term major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as mortality, reinfarction, and target vessel revascularization. RESULTS: A total of 460 patients (214 in the CABG group and 246 in the PCI group) were analyzed. The baseline SS and the cSS were significantly higher in the CABG group compared with the PCI group (30.1±6.7 vs. 22.5±5.6; P<0.01 and 41.4±21.2 vs. 27.2±15.9; P<0.01, respectively). During a follow-up period of 32±8 months, 15 patients from the CABG group and 12 patients from the PCI group died (P=0.33), but the rate of MACE was higher in the PCI group (31 vs. 20%, P<0.01). Receiver operating curve analysis and univariate Cox regression analysis indicated that SS and cSS have prognostic value in the CABG group, but not in the PCI group. In the CABG group, SS and cSS showed significant discriminative power for long-term mortality (for SS>33 sensitivity 73.3%, specificity 71.4% and for cSS>38.4 sensitivity 93.3%, specificity 58.3%) and for MACE (for SS>34.5 sensitivity 50%, specificity 81.4% and for cSS>43.5 sensitivity 66.7%, specificity 73.8%). CONCLUSION: SS and cSS scores have prognostic value in STEMI patients with multivessel disease treated with CABG surgery. cSS may be superior to SS for prediction of long-term adverse events in CABG patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.607

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it