ADDITIONAL RECORDS OF A NON-NATIVE FISH, THE SNOWY GROUPER, (Epinephelus niveatus) IN NOVA SCOTIAN WATERS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
At Clam Harbour, Nova Scotia in September 2005, two juvenile Snowy Groupers,Epinephelus niveatus (Valenciennes 1828), were captured. Subsequently, in October 2006 during the regular census of six artificial reefs in Sambro Harbour near Halifax, four juvenile Snowy Groupers were observed and one was captured. During the observation period the fish remained close to the reefs and fed voraciously. The arrival of the Snowy Groupers was correlated with the occurrence of a warm Gulf Stream tendril and their disappearance coincided with a drop in water temperature to 7.2°C.En septembre 2005, deux méroux neigeux juvéniles (Epinephelus niveatus– Valenciennes, 1828) ont été capturés à Clam Harbour (Nouvelle‑Écosse). En octobre 2006, quatre méroux neigeux juvéniles ont été observés et un autre capturé durant inventaire régulier de six récifs artificiels dans le havre Sambro près de Halifax. Durant la période d’observation, les poissons sont demeurés près des récifs et se nourrissaient avec voracité. L’arrivée et le départ des méroux neigeux ont coïncidé avec l’arrivée et le départ d’une masse d’eau chaude amenée par le Gulf Stream (la température de l’eau a chuté jusqu’à 7,2 °C une fois la masse d’eau chaude passée).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".