Jordanian Universities and Their Role in the Trend towards the Development of Technical Competence for Accounting Learning Outcomes in Line with IES #2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of the study is to identify the role of Jordanian universities in the trend towards the development of technical competence for accounting learning outcomes in line with the second international standard of accounting education (IES 2). In order to achieve the goals of this study, an analytical method was applied to the content of the plans and curricula of a random sample of 10 Jordanian universities, followed by conducting 8 interviews with academic staff in accounting. The study revealed a number of notable findings, chief of which is that Jordanian universities do not apply IES 2, whereby a high proportion of technical competence of educational curricula taught in accounting departments, do not comply with the content requirements stipulated in the IES 2. The study also revealed that the majority of educational courses taught in university accounting departments do not incorporate sufficient topics to provide the required knowledge, and some study plans of universities within the study sample have not been consistently and continuously updated and developed. Based on these findings, the study proposes a number of recommendations, chief of which is requiring Jordanian universities to work towards the standardization of accounting education plans across Jordanian universities as a prerequisite to mitigate the disparity in the results of university competency test among Jordanian universities. In pursuit of this recommendation, this study presents a suggested model for accounting study plan that complies with both IES 2 and the requirements of The Higher Education Accreditation Commission.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".