MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2293572282

An investigation of the psychopathy construct and its (novel) correlates in non-clinical samples

2011· dissertation· en· W2293572282 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBrock University Digital Repository (Brock University) · 2011
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBrock University
KeywordsPsychopathyConstruct (python library)PsychologyClinical psychologyDevelopmental psychologySocial psychologyPersonalityComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A substantial research literature exists regarding the psychopathy construct in forensic 
\npopulations, but more recently, the construct has been extended to non-clinical 
\npopulations. The purpose of the present dissertation was to investigate the content and the 
\ncorrelates of the psychopathy construct, with a particular focus on addressing gaps and 
\ncontroversies in the literature. In Study 1, the role of low anxiety in psychopathy was 
\ninvestigated, as some authors have proposed that low anxiety is integral to the 
\npsychopathy construct. Participants (n = 346) responded to two self-report psychopathy 
\nscales, the SRP-III and the PPI-R, as well as measures of temperament, personality, and 
\nantisociality. Of particular interest was the PPI-R Stress Immunity sub scale, which 
\nrepresents low anxiety content. I t was found that Stress Immunity was not correlated with 
\nSRP-III psychopathy, nor did it share common personality or temperament correlates or 
\ncontribute to the prediction of anti sociality. From Study 1, it was concluded that it was 
\nunlikely that low anxiety is a central feature of the psychopathy construct. In Study 2, the 
\nrelationship between SRP-III psychopathy and Ability Emotional Intelligence (Le., 
\nEmotional Intelligence measured as an ability, rather than as a self-report personality 
\ntrait-like characteristic) was investigated, to determine whether psychopathy is be s t seen 
\nas a syndrome characterized by emotional deficits or by the ability to skillfully 
\nmanipulate and prey upon the others' emotions. A negative correlation between the two 
\nconstructs was found, suggesting that psychopathy is best characterized by deficits in 
\nperceiving, facilitating, managing, and understanding emotions. In Study 3, sex 
\ndifferences in the sexual behavior (i.e., promiscuity, age of first sexual behaviors, 
\nextradyadic sexual relations) and appearance-related esteem (i.e., body shame,appearance anxiety, self-esteem) correlates of SRP-III psychopathy were investigated. 
\nThe sexual behavior correlates of psychopathy were quite similar for men and women, 
\nbut the esteem correlates were very different, such that high psychopathy in men was 
\nrelated to high esteem, whereas high psychopathy in women was generally related to low 
\nesteem. This sex difference was difficult to interpret in that it was not mediated by sexual 
\nbehavior, suggesting that further exploration of this topic is warranted. Together, these 
\nthree studies contribute to our understanding of non-clinical psychopathy, indicating that 
\nlow anxiety is likely not part of the construct, that psychopathy is related to low levels of 
\nability in Emotional Intelligence, and that psychopathy is an important predictor of 
\nbehavior, ability, and beliefs and feelings about the self

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it