MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2293596916 · doi:10.15277/bjd.2016.069

New name, new team, new system

2016· article· en· W2293596916 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul Grant

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Diabetes · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClinical practice guidelines implementation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFocus (optics)Element (criminal law)Cover (algebra)Front coverFront (military)Key (lock)Quarter (Canadian coin)HistoryComputer sciencePolitical scienceLawEngineeringComputer securityMechanical engineeringPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The keen-eyed among you may have spotted something slightly different about the front cover this quarter.We have decided to 'drop the VD' from the title of the ABCD society journal.This is not because we are no longer interested in vascular disease -on the contrary, this clearly remains a key element of what is important to us as diabetologists.Merely, the name shortening reflects a further step in the evolution of the journal, a clear focus of what we are about and the directness of our message and content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.042
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.526
Threshold uncertainty score0.676

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.042
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0140.015
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5260.500

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of DiabetesSame topicClinical practice guidelines implementationFrench-language works237,207