L’image au corps : L’allégorie luxuriante des performances photos chez Annie Baillargeon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In today's generalized culture of screen images, new nondisciplines are entering the visual arts, media arts, action art, and art theory. Digital technologies, in particular, are multiplying in inventiveness and creating experimental zones between images, sound, and text. Art photography oscillates between reality-fiction, photographic sculptures, and allegorical narrativity. Annie Baillargeon's stunning photomontages luxuriantly construct this third type, the photographic narrative. Inspired by the codes of action art (solo performances and collective movements) and movie scenarios (photo and video), her large works revamp the venerable genre of allegory. An elegant mystery floats in her settings, in which she is the body-material and the character with multiple identities. Tension is created between the sacred and the libido in a pop subculture iconoclasm of undefined ethical zones. In fact, allegorical photography such as this, at the beginning of a new millennium, paradoxically speaks to the hermeneutic analytical gaze as art criticism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.210 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".