MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2293683087 · doi:10.1201/9781003059325-21

Geo-Topo Maps: Hybrid Visualization of Movement Data over Building Floor Plans and Maps

2020· book-chapter· en· W2293683087 on OpenAlexaff
Quentin Ventura, Michael J. McGuffin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Visualization and Analytics
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisualizationMovement (music)CartographyComputer scienceGeographyData miningArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We demonstrate how movements of multiple people or objects within a building can be displayed on a network representation of the building, where nodes are rooms and edges are doors. Our representation shows the direction of movements between rooms and the order in which rooms are visited, while avoiding occlusion or overplotting when there are repeated visits or multiple moving people or objects. We further propose the use of a hybrid visualization that mixes geospatial and topological (network-based) representations, enabling focus-in-context and multi-focal visualizations. An experimental comparison found that the topological representation was significantly faster than the purely geospatial representation for three out of four tasks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.914
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicData Visualization and AnalyticsFrench-language works237,207