MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Exercise induces Hsp70 in endothelial cells of the coronary vasculature

2008· article· en· W2293684624 on OpenAlexaff
Steve Michael Wolff, Kevin Milne, Earl G. Noble

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHeat shock proteins research
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHsp70Heat shock proteinInternal medicineBlotImmunofluorescenceEx vivoShock (circulatory)EndocrinologyChemistryMedicineCardiologyImmunologyIn vitroAntibodyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exercise (EX) and heat‐shock (HS) both lead to increased myocardial content of the cardioprotective inducible isoform of the 70 kDa heat shock protein, (Hsp70). Twenty‐four hours after HS, myocardial Hsp70 is co‐localized with blood vessels, indicating a cell‐type specific response to this stress. The objective of the current study was to determine whether a similar localization of myocardial Hsp70 occurs post‐EX. Adult male Sprague Dawley rats were randomized into control (CON), EX (60 min treadmill running, 30 m/min) or HS (42°C, 15 min) groups. Left ventricles (LV) were harvested at 30 min and 24 hrs post‐treatment and analyzed for Hsp70 by both western blotting and confocal immunofluorescence microscopy. Both HS and EX resulted in significant increases in Hsp70 in LV homogenates. Under both conditions, confocal microscopy revealed a minor increase in Hsp70 in the myocytes compared to CON, but as early as 30 min post‐treatment there was a striking increase in endothelial localized Hsp70 that persisted for up to 24 hrs. These data support previous findings with HS and suggest that exercise results in a similar cell‐type specific induction of myocardial Hsp70. Consequently, the cardioprotective nature of exercise may lie in the Hsp70 mediated protection of coronary blood vessels. Supported by CIHR‐CCT‐83029 and NSERC‐8170‐05 RGPIN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicHeat shock proteins researchFrench-language works237,207