MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2293694915

Cultural Aspects of Being Poor

2016· article· en· W2293694915 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sinan Çaya

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural and Sociopolitical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPovertyScarcityPhenomenonDevelopment economicsState (computer science)Culture of povertySociologyBasic needsEconomicsEconomic growthEpistemologyMarket economyComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Poor people are those who are far below the average regarding the income necessary for a living. Poverty represents a severe form of deprivation from many material goods as well as services, which the rich or the middle classes can easily afford. The psychological state is deeply affected by the harsh reality of scarcity; thereby leading to the development of common traits, all of which eventually contribute to the formation of a sociological situation easy to recognize. The appropriate name for this phenomenon is the culture of poverty, which stays embedded in the behavior patterns even long after material well-being is somehow actually acquired.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.848
Threshold uncertainty score0.898

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCross-cultural communicationSame topicCultural and Sociopolitical StudiesFrench-language works237,207