MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2293785325 · doi:10.1002/pbc.25955

Guideline for the Treatment of Breakthrough and the Prevention of Refractory Chemotherapy‐Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Children With Cancer

2016· review· en· W2293785325 on OpenAlex
Jacqueline Flank, Paula D. Robinson, Mark T. Holdsworth, Carol Portwine, Paul Gibson, Cathy Maan, Nancy Stefin, Lillian Sung, L. Lee Dupuis

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Blood & Cancer · 2016
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNausea and vomiting management
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreMcMaster UniversityHospital for Sick ChildrenMcMaster University Medical CentreUniversity of TorontoPediatric Oncology GroupOntario Clinical Oncology Group
FundersNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchPediatric Oncology Group of OntarioHospital for Sick ChildrenChildren’s Oncology Group
KeywordsMedicineGuidelineChemotherapy-induced nausea and vomitingNauseaRefractory (planetary science)Intensive care medicineVomitingPsychological interventionAntiemeticClinical PracticeInternal medicineFamily medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This clinical practice guideline provides an approach to the treatment of breakthrough chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) and the prevention of refractory CINV in children. It was developed by an international, interprofessional panel and is based on systematic literature reviews. Evidence-based interventions for the treatment of breakthrough and prophylaxis of refractory CINV are recommended. Gaps in the evidence used to support the recommendations made in this clinical practice guideline were identified. The contribution of these recommendations to breakthrough and refractory CINV control in children requires prospective evaluation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.518

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it