Simultaneous spectrophotometric determination of iron and copper with chromogenic mixed reagents by partial least squares and H-point standard addition methods
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nous decrivons la determination simultanee du fer et cuivre total en utilisant soit la methode des moindres carres partiels (PLS), soit celle d'addition standard au point-H (HPSAM). Nous avons utilise le melange de reactifs de 1,10- phenanthroline et de neocuproine pour la determination du fer et du cuivre. En appliquant la methode sur 15 echantillons synthetiques dans la gamme de concentration de 0.10-8.00 μg mL-' en Fe et de 0.12-8.75 μg mL - 1 en Cu, l'erreur relative standard totale a ete de 2.02%. Les deux methodes PLS et HPSAM ont demontre des capacites convenables pour determiner avec exactitude le fer et le cuivre a partir des spectres d'absorption superposes de leurs complexes. La methode proposee a ete appliquee avec succes pour la determination du fer et du cuivre dans le serum sanguin et l'eau de riviere. Les resultats de plusieurs echantillons analyses par la methode proposee sont en accord avec ceux obtenus par la technique FAAS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it