MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2293887361 · doi:10.1109/lcomm.2016.2517142

A Relaxed Min-Sum LDPC Decoder With Simplified Check Nodes

2016· article· en· W2293887361 on OpenAlexaff
Saied Hemati, François Leduc-Primeau, Warren J. Gross

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicError Correcting Code Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLow-density parity-check codeDecoding methodsComputer scienceAlgorithmSoft-decision decoderOffset (computer science)Very-large-scale integrationComputationQuantization (signal processing)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This letter presents a heuristic technique for simplifying the parity-check node operation in a relaxed min-sum iterative decoder. The proposed decoder eliminates the second-minimum computation in check nodes, which allows broadcasting the same output to all neighboring variable nodes to alleviate routing problem in VLSI implementations of low-density parity check (LDPC) decoders. The second-minimum, when required, is emulated by adding an offset to the first-minimum. The proposed relaxed decoder also uses a relaxation factor equal to 0.5 to simplify variable nodes. Simulation results for two LDPC codes show the proposed decoding algorithm with only 4-bit quantization closely matches the performance of floating-point normalized/offset min-sum and sum-product decoders in the waterfall region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications LettersSame topicError Correcting Code TechniquesFrench-language works237,207