MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2294048205

Effects of different surface mulching on soil organic nitrogen accumulation and mineralization in dryland of Northwestern China

2010· article· en· W2294048205 on OpenAlexaff
Northwest Agriculture Xie Jiayang, Northwest Agriculture Wang Zhaohui, Northwest Agriculture Li Shengxiu

Bibliographic record

VenueZhongguo nongye Kexue · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental and Agricultural Sciences
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMulchStrawMineralization (soil science)NitrogenAgronomyChemistryNitrogen deficiencyPlastic filmSoil waterNitrogen cycleEnvironmental scienceSoil scienceBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective Understanding soil nitrogen transformation and supplying process is the key for optimizing crop cultivation and nitrogen managements. Method In this paper, soils were sampled from a 5-year-long field experiment to study the effects of different soil surface mulching on soil organic nitrogen accumulation and mineralization in dryland of northwestern China. Result The results showed that compared to conventional cultivation, long term surface mulching with straw increased soil nitrogen mineralization potential but decreased mineralization rate. Mulching with plastic-film decreased nitrogen mineralization potential, but increased mineralization rate. The nitrogen mineralization potential for the conventional cultivation, straw mulching and plastic film mulching was 25.0-29.7, 23.2-25.9 and 23.3-26.2 mg.kg-1, respectively. Without N application, straw and plastic-film mulching increased soil organic nitrogen and light fraction organic nitrogen contents. When N was fertilized, straw mulching could increase soil organic nitrogen and light fraction organic nitrogen contents, while plastic-film mulching decreased their contents. At N rate of 240 kg.hm-2, the organic nitrogen content was 1.03, 0.95 and 0.96 g.kg-1, and the light fraction organic nitrogen content was 51, 35 and 37 mg.kg-1 for the conventional cultivation, straw mulching and plastic film mulching, respectively. Conclusion It is concluded that surface mulching with straw causes soil to immobilize more mineral N into mineralisable organic N, while with plastic film is not beneficial to organic nitrogen accumulation. Therefore, in order to increase crop yield, more nitrogen fertilizer is needed or supplemental N fertilizer should be applied at the key nitrogen requirement stage under straw mulching cultivation as it could increase soil N supply capacity. For plastic film mulching, more attention should be paid to application of organic fertilizer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZhongguo nongye KexueSame topicEnvironmental and Agricultural SciencesFrench-language works237,207