MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Updated results from a phase III trial of sunitinib in GIST patients (pts) for whom imatinib (IM) therapy has failed due to resistance or intolerance

2006· article· en· W2294103278 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSunitinibPlaceboInterim analysisClinical endpointInternal medicineSunitinib malateGastroenterologyPhases of clinical researchTyrosine-kinase inhibitorUrologyOncologyClinical trialCancerPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

9513 Background: Sunitinib malate (previously known as SU11248) is an oral multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor with both antitumor and antiangiogenic effects due to blockade of KIT, PDGFRs, VEGFRs, FLT3, and RET. Initial results from this phase III trial showed sunitinib was associated with significantly longer TTP than placebo in IM-resistant GIST pts. Methods: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial compared sunitinib 50 mg/day (N=207) to placebo (N=105) in IM-resistant or -intolerant GIST pts. Treatment was administered in 6-week cycles (4 weeks on, 2 weeks off treatment). The primary endpoint was TTP. Secondary endpoints included PFS, OS, ORR, and pain and health status (HS) measures. Pain relief response rate (PRRR) was defined as the proportion of pts who had ≥1 pain relief response event (based on weekly changes in present pain index of MPQ and analgesic consumption). HS was measured using the EQ-5D questionnaire. Results: A planned interim analysis showed significantly longer median TTP with sunitinib versus placebo (27.3 vs 6.4 weeks; HR, 0.33; P<0.001), which led to unblinding of the study and crossover of all placebo pts to open-label sunitinib. OS was also significantly longer with sunitinib (median OS will be presented). Sunitinib therapy induced PRs in 14 pts (6.8%) and durable SD (≥22 weeks) in 36 (17.4%) vs. 0% PR and SD ≥22 weeks in 2 (1.9%) pts on placebo. Four of 9 IM-intolerant pts achieved PR with sunitinib therapy versus 0 of 4 IM-intolerant pts treated with placebo. There was a trend for higher PRRR with sunitinib versus placebo in the ITT population (17.4% vs 9.5%, P=0.064) and in 174 pts who reported pain or analgesic use at baseline (31.0% vs 17.2%, P=0.052). The most common treatment-related AEs were fatigue, diarrhea, skin discoloration, and nausea, which were usually grade 1/2 and easily managed. Updated survival and tumor-control efficacy measures, tolerability, and HS results will be available for presentation. Conclusions: Sunitinib significantly prolonged TTP and OS in GIST pts for whom IM therapy had failed due to resistance or intolerance. This trial demonstrated major clinical benefit from a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor in pts resistant to a different kinase inhibitor. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.186
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.195
GPT teacher head0.490
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it