Strategic Environmental Assessment as an Instrument for Sustainable Development of the Danube Corridor Through Serbia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Strategic environmental assessment is one of the most important instruments for the implementation of sustainable development strategy in spatial planning in general. Given the importance of the Danube corridor in ecological, economic and social terms, as well as the fact that it is a significant corridor for international navigation, it is important to consider the significance and possibilities of applying SEA in planning the sustainable spatial development of this area. This paper presents the methodological framework for applying the SEA carried out for the needs of the Spatial Plan, in particular for the section of the Danube corridor passing through the Republic of Serbia. The paper focuses on the inclusion of all aspects of sustainable development in the SEA process, especially when conducting qualitative multi-criteria evaluation of the planning solutions. The results obtained indicate that the impacts (positive and negative) of the planned activities provide a basis for making decisions that should enable sustainable development of the planning area.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it